Green HRM And Sustainability Orientation in Relation to Carbon-Reduction Performance: The Moderating Role of Perceived Vision 2030 Alignment

Authors

  • Mirza Abdulaziz Abdrubalrsool Al Qussair Department of Business Administration, Imam Abdul Rahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
  • Batal Haran Salem Almari Department of Business Administration, Imam Abdul Rahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
  • Nawaf Saud A Aldossary Department of Business Administration, Imam Abdul Rahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65080/ajbmss.v2i1.CMT2621101002

Keywords:

Green HRM, sustainability orientation, vision 2030 alignment, natural resource-based view, carbon-reduction performance

Abstract

Introduction: This study examined the relationship between green human resource management (GHRM), sustainability orientation, and carbon reduction performance in Saudi-based sustainability-focused firms, with perceived Vision 2030 alignment as a moderator. This study utilises the Natural Resource-Based View (NRBV), Stakeholder Theory, and Institutional Theory to examine the association between internal environmental capabilities, institutional alignment, and carbon outcomes.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey design was used, and 250 valid responses were collected from environmental and operations staff. The data were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate reliability, validity, direct relationships, and moderation.

Results: A significant positive association between Green HRM and carbon-reduction performance (β = 0.524, p < 0.01) and a significant positive relationship (β = 0.230, p < 0.01) were also observed between sustainability orientation and carbon reduction performance. The moderation effect of perceived Vision 2030 alignment was small but statistically and meaningfully significant on the relationship between GHRM and carbon-reduction performance (β = 0.058, p < 0.01) and between sustainability orientation and carbon-reduction performance (β = 0.032, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Alignment with national decarbonisation strategies (Vision 2030) in Green HRM practices and the organisation’s vision, decision-making, and operational processes is positively associated with carbon reduction performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afthanorhan, A., Ghazali, P. L., & Rashid, N. (2021). Discriminant validity: A comparison of CBSEM and consistent PLS using Fornell & Larcker and HTMT approaches. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1874, No. 1, p. 012085). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1874/1/012085

Agyapong, A., Aidoo, S. O., Acquaah, M., & Akomea, S. (2023). Environmental orientation and sustainability performance; the mediated moderation effects of green supply chain management practices and institutional pressure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 430, 139592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139592

Ahmad, F., Hossain, M. B., Mustafa, K., Ejaz, F., Khawaja, K. F., & Dunay, A. (2023). Green HRM practices and knowledge sharing improve environmental performance by raising employee commitment to the environment. Sustainability, 15(6), 5040. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065040

Ahmad, S., Javed, U., Sharma, C., & Siddiqui, M. S. (2025). Green human resource management: Analyzing sustainable practices and organizational impact through a Word2Vec approach. Green Technologies and Sustainability, 3(4), 100224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.grets.2025.100224

Alajmi, R. G. (2024). Energy consumption and carbon emissions: An empirical study of Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 16(13), 5496. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135496

Al-Barakati, M. (2024). Saudi Arabia’s on the frontline of battle against climate change. Arab News PK. Available from: https://www.arabnews.pk/node/2504751/business-economy (Accessed on: 19 June, 2026).

AlKhars, M., Masoud, M., AlNasser, A., & Alsubaie, M. (2024). Sustainable practices and firm competitiveness: An empirical analysis of the Saudi Arabian energy sector. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00347-7

Altassan, M. A. (2025). Sustainable leadership and green HRM: Fostering environmentally responsible organizational cultures. Sustainability, 17(20), 9331. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209331

Altouma, A., Bashir, B., Ata, B., Ocwa, A., Alsalman, A., Harsányi, E., & Mohammed, S. (2024). An environmental impact assessment of Saudi Arabia’s vision 2030 for sustainable urban development: A policy perspective on greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 21(1), 100323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2023.100323

Basali, M., & Alshahrani, S. O. (2025). Vision 2030 in action: how ESG disclosure shape financial performance in Saudi Arabia. Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSAR-06-2025-0222

Cheung, G.W., Cooper-Thomas, H.D., Lau, R.S. & Wang, L.C. (2023). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41, 745-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y

Daily, B. F., & Huang, S. C. (2001). Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(12), 1539-1552. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110410892

El Khatib, M., & Alsereidi, F. (2025). Bridging knowledge and action: How education advances awareness and business engagement in environmental sustainability. International Journal of Theory of Organization and Practice (IJTOP), 5(1), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.54489/wkg0rp67

Elfakharani, A. M. (2024). The Legislative Impact of Vision 2030 on Multinational Companies in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Human Security, 20(1), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.12924/johs2024.20105

Fangqi, D., Irfan, M., & Baloch, Z. (2023). Revolutionizing quality performance through digitization, technology management, and environmental management: a cutting-edge PLS-SEM model analysis with organizational agility as mediator and culture as moderator. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1169145. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1169145

Gauthier, J. (2013). Institutional theory and corporate sustainability: Determinant versus interactive approaches. Organization Management Journal, 10(2), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15416518.2013.801741

Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). An introduction to structural equation modeling. In Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook (pp. 1-29). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_1

Howard, M. C., Boudreaux, M., & Oglesby, M. (2024). Can Harman’s single-factor test reliably distinguish between research designs? Not in published management studies. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 33(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2024.2393462

Ibrahim, M., & Mahmood, R. (2022). Proactive environmental strategy and environmental performance of the manufacturing SMEs of Karachi city in Pakistan: Role of green mindfulness as a DCV. Sustainability, 14(19), 12431. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912431

Islam, M.T. & Ali, A. (2024). Sustainable green energy transition in Saudi Arabia: Characterizing policy framework, interrelations and future research directions. Next Energy, 5, 100161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxener.2024.100161

Jackson, S. E., Renwick, D. W., Jabbour, C. J., & Muller-Camen, M. (2011). State-of-the-art and future directions for green human resource management: Introduction to the special issue. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(2), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.2307/23279428

Jeng, C. C. (2023). Why a variance inflation factor of 10 is not an ideal cutoff for multicollinearity diagnostics. Journal of Education Studies, 57(2), 67-93. https://doi.org/10.53106/199044282023105702004

Jin, Z., Navare, J., & Lynch, R. (2019). The relationship between innovation culture and innovation outcomes: Exploring the effects of sustainability orientation and firm size. R&D Management, 49(4), 607-623. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12351

Kang, H. (2021). Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*power software. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18(17). https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17

Kauppi, K. (2022). Chapter 21 Institutional theory. In Handbook of Theories for Purchasing, Supply Chain and Management Research (pp. 320-334). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839104503.00025

Khuntia, R., M, H., Deepasari, K., Gupta, Y. C., R, K. (2025). Green HRM practices: From policy to employee behaviour change. Journal of Marketing & Social Research, 2(7), 149-155. https://doi.org/10.61336/jmsr/25-07-18

Kumar, A., Sethi, S.R. & Sahoo, C.K. (2025). Greening the workforce: Unveiling the role of proactive employee behaviour in enhancing environmental performance. Strategic Business Research, 1(1), 1-12, 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbr.2025.100005

Legese, M. A., Zhou, S., Tiruneh, W. A., & Ying, H. (2026). How green HRM enhances sustainable organizational performance: A capability-building explanation through green innovation and organizational culture. Sustainability, 18(2), 764. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020764

Liu, R., Wang, Y., & Liu, C. (2025). Can green policy enhance corporate environmental performance? Evidence from China’s new energy demonstration city policy. Energies, 18(19), 5238. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195238

Mah, P. Y., Chuah, F., & Sahar, E. (2023). Corporate sustainability orientation, sustainable development practices, and firm performance of MSMEs in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Business Research, 13(2), 107-127.

https://dx.doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.230152

Mahajan, R., Lim, W. M., Sareen, M., Kumar, S., & Panwar, R. (2023). Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Research, 166, 114104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114104

Martusewicz, J., Suchorski, K., Chomiak-Orsa, I., Usyk, J., Bednarowicz, Ł., & Łukaszewicz, M. (2025). From Organizational Readiness to Industry 5.0: An EFQM Model Pathway to Net Zero. Energies, 18(11), 2722. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18112722

McDougall, N., Wagner, B., & MacBryde, J. (2019). An empirical explanation of the natural-resource-based view of the firm. Production Planning & Control, 30(16), 1366-1382. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1620361

Mia, M. M., Zayed, N. M., Islam, K. M. A., Nitsenko, V., Matusevych, T., & Mordous, I. (2022). The strategy of factors influencing learning satisfaction explored by first and second-order Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Inventions, 7(3), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions7030059

Mishra, S., & Rath, N. (2024). Impact of Green Human Resource Management Practices on Environmental Performance of Indian Banking Sector: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(4), 1457–1469. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190423

Niazi, U. I., Nisar, Q. A., Nasir, N., Naz, S., Haider, S., & Khan, W. (2023). Green HRM, green innovation and environmental performance: the role of green transformational leadership and green corporate social responsibility. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 45353–45368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25442-6

Wan Mustapa, W. N. B., Hayat, N., Fazal, S. A., Al Mamun, A., Salameh, A. A., & Zainol, N. R. (2022). Modeling the significance of sustainability orientation on the sustainability performance of micro-enterprises in an emerging economy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 881086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.881086

Obilor, E. I. (2023). Convenience and purposive sampling techniques: Are they the same. International Journal of Innovative Social & Science Education Research, 11(1), 1-7. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Esezi-Obilor/publication/398681103_Convenience_and_Purposive_Sampling_Techniques_Are_they_the_Same/links/693fe9e8a1fd01798907e406/Convenience-and-Purposive-Sampling-Techniques-Are-they-the-Same.pdf

Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana, N., Aguilera‐Caracuel, J., & Morales‐Raya, M. (2016). Corporate governance and environmental sustainability: The moderating role of the national institutional context. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(3), 150-164. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1367

Pasamar, S., Bornay-Barrachina, M., & Morales-Sánchez, R. (2025). Institutional pressures for sustainability: a triple bottom line approach. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 34(4), 460-484. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2022-0241

Putra, F. M., Lestari, I. A., & bin Zulkifli, A. F. (2025). Sustainability Orientation, Green Innovation Capability, and Competitive Advantage among ASEAN Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Economics and Management, 3(3), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.70716/ecoma.v3i3.328

Renwick, D. W., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x

Reuters (2024). Aramco, SLB and Linde plan to build carbon capture project. Reuters.

Available from: https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/aramco-slb-linde-plan-build-carbon-capture-project-2024-12-04/ (Accessed on: 19 June, 2026).

Ribeiro, R. P., & Gavronski, I. (2021). Sustainable management of human resources and stakeholder theory: A review. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 15, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v15.2729

de Sena Silva, N., Gomes, S.C., Filho, E. J. M. A., & Galina, S. V. R. (2025). Sustainability orientation, environmental knowledge integration, and strength of ties: Governance and sustainable performance in regulated agribusiness. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(6), 7310–7325. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70080

Soussi, J. C., Aljaaidi, K. S., & Alwadani, N. F. (2025). Sustainable environmental Governance and Corporate Environmental Performance: Empirical Evidence from Saudi Companies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(11), 616–616. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18110616

Unnisa, S. T., Kee, D. M. H., Alyafi-AlZahri, R., Alsanie, G., & BinSaeed, R. (2023). Corporate Sustainability and Vision 2030: Exploring ARAMCO's role in promoting social responsibility for sustainability. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(12), e1408. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i12.1408

Taherdoost, H. (2022). What are different research approaches? Comprehensive review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research, their applications, types, and limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538

Tang, G., Chen, Y., Jiang, Y., Paillé, P., & Jia, J. (2018). Green human resource management practices: scale development and validity. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56(1), 31-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12147

Yuning, M., Taozhen, H., Saleem, N., & Hassan, A. H. (2024). Institutional pressure and low carbon innovation policy: the role of EMS, environmental interpretations and governance heterogeneity. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1385062. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1385062

Zehir, C., & Ozgul, B. (2020). Environmental orientation and firm performance: The mediation mechanism of green innovation. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 9(5), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i5.883

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Green HRM And Sustainability Orientation in Relation to Carbon-Reduction Performance: The Moderating Role of Perceived Vision 2030 Alignment. (2026). AJBMSS - Advance Journal of Business Management and Social Sciences, 2(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.65080/ajbmss.v2i1.CMT2621101002